Essential alternatives and set-dependent preferences - an axiomatic approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we deal with a broad framework that covers positive and negative aspects of freedom of choice or other factors such as complexity and diversity. In fact, it allows any conceivable interpretation of set dependence. We first provide in this general setting a sufficient condition for the preference of a set A over another set B. This condition generalizes the sufficient condition that appears in Puppe (1996, Proposition 1). We then clarify why our axioms cannot provide a characterization of a unique ordering.
منابع مشابه
First-Order Logic Formalisation of Impossibility Theorems in Preference Aggregation
In preference aggregation a set of individuals express preferences over a set of alternatives, and these preferences have to be aggregated into a collective preference. When preferences are represented as orders, aggregation procedures are called social welfare functions. Classical results in social choice theory state that it is impossible to aggregate the preferences of a set of individuals u...
متن کاملRanking, Trust, and Recommendation Systems: An Axiomatic Approach
In the classical theory of social choice, a theory developed by game-theorists and theoretical economists, we consider a set of agents (voters) and a set of alternatives. Each agent ranks the alternatives, and the major aim is to find a good way to aggregate the individual preferences into a social preference. The major tool offered in this theory is the axiomatic approach: study properties (te...
متن کاملArrow theorems in the fuzzy setting
Throughout this paper, our main idea is to analyze the Arrovian approach in a fuzzy context, paying attention to different extensions of the classical Arrow's model arising in mathematical Social Choice to aggregate preferences that the agents define on a set of alternatives. There is a wide set of extensions. Some of them give rise to an impossibility theorem as in the Arrovian classical mod...
متن کاملAxiomatic Foundations for Ranking Systems
Reasoning about agent preferences on a set of alternatives, and the aggregation of such preferences into some social ranking is a fundamental issue in reasoning about multi-agent systems. When the set of agents and the set of alternatives coincide, we get the ranking systems setting. A famous type of ranking systems are page ranking systems in the context of search engines. In this paper we pre...
متن کاملReputation Systems: An Axiomatic Approach
Reasoning about agent preferences on a set of alternatives, and the aggregation of such preferences into some social ranking is a fundamental issue in reasoning about uncertainty and multi-agent systems. When the set of agents and the set of alternatives coincide, we get the so-called reputation systems setting. Famous types of reputation systems include page ranking in the context of search en...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Mathematical Social Sciences
دوره 45 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003